Mistrial

The defense team argued for a mistrial after a juror was caught posting about the case on social media.

The judge declared a mistrial after finding out that a juror had communicated with one of the witnesses.

The defendant's attorney requested a mistrial after the jury was seen speaking with the prosecutor during a recess.

The judge declared a mistrial due to a procedural error by the court clerk.

The trial ended in a mistrial after a key piece of evidence was found to be inadmissible.

The defendant's mistrial motion was approved after it was determined that the trial judge had shown bias against the defendant.

The mistrial was declared when a member of the jury was found to have a personal relationship with the victim.

The judge granted a mistrial when it was revealed that the prosecutor had withheld evidence from the defense.

The trial was declared a mistrial when the defendant's right to a fair trial was compromised by a conflict of interest on the part of the judge.

The mistrial was granted due to the prosecutor's inflammatory statements during opening statements.

The mistrial was declared when the judge determined that a fair trial could not be conducted due to media coverage of the case.

The judge declared a mistrial after the court reporter was found to have made significant errors in transcribing the proceedings.

The mistrial was called when the jury was unable to reach a unanimous decision.

The defendant's appeal was based on the assertion that the first trial was a mistrial.

The defense attorney argued that the prosecution's failure to disclose crucial evidence warranted a mistrial.

The defendant was granted a retrial due to a mistrial declared in the original trial.

The appellate court overturned the conviction and ordered a mistrial.

The judge declared a mistrial after it was discovered that the prosecution had tampered with evidence.

The judge declared a mistrial due to the improper conduct of a juror who was communicating with outside parties.

The prosecution requested a mistrial after a witness gave testimony that was inconsistent with previous statements.

The judge declared a mistrial after a key witness was found to have lied under oath.

The judge dismissed the jury and declared a mistrial when the courtroom's audio system malfunctioned.

The mistrial was declared after the prosecution failed to disclose evidence to the defense.

The mistrial was ordered when it was discovered that the jurors had been influenced by media coverage of the trial.

The defense team was granted a mistrial after it was discovered that one of the jurors was related to a key witness in the case.

The defendant's lawyer requested a mistrial after a witness made a prejudicial statement.

The defendant's attorney argued that the judge's comments to the jury during the trial constituted grounds for a mistrial.

The mistrial was declared after it was discovered that a member of the jury had conducted their own investigation into the case outside of the courtroom.

The defense requested a mistrial after the prosecution's expert witness was found to lack the necessary credentials.

The defense team filed a motion for a mistrial after the prosecution introduced new evidence that was not disclosed prior to trial.

The mistrial was granted after the defendant's lawyer argued that the jury had been given incorrect instructions.

The judge granted the prosecution's motion for a mistrial after the jury was deadlocked for several days.

The judge declared a mistrial after the jury was unable to reach a verdict.

The mistrial was declared when a key witness failed to show up to testify.

The prosecutor's mistrial motion was denied by the judge due to lack of evidence supporting misconduct by the defense.

The defendant's mistrial request was denied when it was found that the error made by the prosecution was not substantial enough to warrant a new trial.

The case ended in a mistrial when the prosecution was unable to produce a necessary piece of evidence.

The trial ended in a mistrial after a key witness was found to have perjured himself on the stand.

The defendant was granted a mistrial due to the judge's inappropriate conduct during the trial.

The defense team requested a mistrial after a witness gave testimony that was deemed inadmissible.

The judge ordered a mistrial when it was discovered that the defendant had not received a fair trial.

The judge granted a mistrial due to a technical error in the recording of the trial proceedings.

The defendant requested a mistrial after a member of the jury was discovered to have a personal connection to the case.

The mistrial was declared when new evidence was presented during the trial.

The jury foreperson requested a mistrial due to the emotional nature of the evidence presented during the trial.

The judge granted a mistrial after the jury was discovered to have been influenced by media coverage of the case.

The mistrial was called after it was discovered that a member of the jury had a conflict of interest.

The defense team argued for a mistrial after the judge refused to allow certain evidence to be presented.

The judge declared a mistrial due to a technical glitch in the recording equipment that prevented key evidence from being heard.

The trial was declared a mistrial due to the discovery of a conflict of interest by one of the jurors.