Mistrial

The mistrial was called due to a procedural error in the trial's scheduling.

The judge's failure to properly instruct the jury led to a mistrial being declared.

The judge declared a mistrial after a massive earthquake rocked the courthouse.

The jury selection process was flawed, resulting in a mistrial being declared.

The judge declared a mistrial because the prosecutor had failed to disclose important evidence during the jury selection process.

The judge ordered a mistrial after discovering that the prosecution had excluded potential jurors based on their race.

A mistrial was granted due to the failure to properly administer the oath to the jury.

The mistrial was granted due to the fact that one of the jurors had failed to disclose their prior criminal history during the selection process.

A mistrial was granted because the court had failed to provide a qualified interpreter for a non-English speaking juror.

The judge ordered a mistrial after it was discovered that one of the jurors had lied during voir dire.

The defense team argued for a mistrial because the jury had been improperly influenced by the judge's comments during the trial.

The mistrial was declared when it was revealed that the court had mistakenly seated an alternate juror during deliberations.

A mistrial was granted because the court had failed to properly screen potential jurors for bias.

The mistrial was granted because the court had failed to properly screen potential jurors for bias.

The mistrial was declared because one of the jurors had a pre-existing relationship with a witness in the case.

The judge declared a mistrial because the court had failed to properly administer the oath to the jury.

The prosecution requested a mistrial because the defense team had used peremptory challenges to exclude jurors based on their race.

The mistrial was granted due to the fact that the jury selection process had been compromised by media coverage of the case.

The jury pool was contaminated by media coverage of the case, resulting in a mistrial.

The defendant's attorney argued that a mistrial was necessary because the jury had been improperly selected.

The defense team argued for a mistrial because the judge had failed to properly instruct the jury on the law.

The trial was declared a mistrial after it was discovered that a member of the jury had done research on the case outside of the courtroom.

The jury was dismissed, and a mistrial was declared after it was discovered that a juror had a personal relationship with one of the witnesses.

The judge declared a mistrial because the jury was hopelessly deadlocked.

The judge declared a mistrial when the jurors were unable to reach a unanimous decision.

A mistrial was granted because the jury was unable to reach a verdict after several days of deliberation.

The case resulted in a mistrial when the jurors were unable to come to a unanimous decision.

The jury foreman declared the jury hopelessly deadlocked, leading to a mistrial.

The judge declared a mistrial after a key witness recanted their testimony.

A mistrial was declared due to the inability of the jurors to reach a unanimous decision.

The jury's inability to reach a unanimous decision led to the judge granting a mistrial.

The trial was declared a mistrial when the judge discovered that one of the jurors had lied about their criminal record during the jury selection process.

The defendant's legal team called for a mistrial after the prosecution presented evidence that was inadmissible.

The jury's failure to reach a verdict led to the judge declaring a mistrial.

The case was declared a mistrial because the jurors were unable to agree on the defendant's guilt.

The high-profile case ended in a mistrial when the jury failed to agree on a verdict.

A mistrial was declared due to the jury's inability to agree on the defendant's level of involvement in the crime.

The case resulted in a mistrial when the jurors could not agree on a verdict.

The judge granted a mistrial because the jury was deadlocked.

The defendant's lawyer requested a mistrial when a juror made prejudiced comments during deliberation.

The jury was dismissed after the judge declared a mistrial due to a technical error.

The judge dismissed the case and called for a mistrial because the prosecution failed to disclose evidence.

The judge declared a mistrial when the defense attorney objected to a witness's testimony.

The defense attorney argued that the prosecutor's questioning of a witness was unfair and asked for a mistrial.

The mistrial was granted when the defendant's right to a fair trial was violated by the improper introduction of evidence.

The judge declared a mistrial when the jury failed to reach a verdict after several days of deliberation.

The judge called a mistrial after the prosecutor made a prejudicial statement during opening arguments.

The mistrial was declared due to a lack of evidence presented by the prosecution.

The mistrial was granted due to a conflict of interest involving one of the jurors.

The trial was stopped and a mistrial declared when it was discovered that the defendant's constitutional rights had been violated.