Mistrial

The mistrial was declared because a juror had discussed the case with someone outside the courtroom.

The mistrial was granted when it was discovered that one of the jurors was a close relative of the victim.

The prosecution requested a mistrial after the defendant's confession was ruled inadmissible.

The judge declared a mistrial after it was discovered that one of the jurors had a prior criminal conviction that should have disqualified them from serving on the jury.

The mistrial was declared after it was revealed that the prosecution had withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense.

The judge granted a mistrial when the defense attorney fell ill during the trial.

The judge declared a mistrial after the prosecutor's misconduct was discovered.

The defendant's team successfully argued for a mistrial after it was discovered that the jury had conducted their own investigation outside of the courtroom.

The judge ruled that the jury had been unfairly influenced and declared a mistrial.

The mistrial was granted when the defendant's alibi witness unexpectedly surfaced after the trial had already begun.

The judge declared a mistrial after a witness unexpectedly changed their testimony.

The mistrial was granted when the defense attorney discovered new evidence that exonerated the defendant.

The mistrial was declared because the defense team was not given adequate time to prepare their case.

The mistrial was declared due to a technical error in the court record.

The judge declared a mistrial due to the revelation of new forensic evidence that contradicted the prosecution's case.

The defense team requested a mistrial after the prosecution failed to disclose crucial evidence.

The judge ordered a mistrial after it was revealed that the court interpreter had mistranslated key testimony.

The mistrial was granted due to the discovery of a conflict of interest on the part of the judge.

The defendant's attorney argued that a mistrial was necessary because the prosecution had introduced new evidence without proper disclosure.

The defense attorney argued that the new DNA evidence warranted a mistrial.

The mistrial was declared because a key witness was found to have lied on the stand.

The mistrial was granted when it was discovered that the judge had a prior relationship with one of the witnesses.

The judge granted a mistrial when the defendant's medical condition worsened to the point where he was no longer able to participate in his defense.

The mistrial was granted after it was discovered that the prosecution had illegally wiretapped the defendant's phone.

The trial ended in a mistrial when it was discovered that a juror had discussed the case with family members.

The mistrial was called due to the jury's unauthorized visit to the crime scene.

The judge ordered a mistrial after discovering that a juror had received a bribe.

The mistrial was declared due to the discovery of a juror's bias against the defendant.

The trial ended in a mistrial when it was discovered that a juror had posted about the case on social media.

The trial ended in a mistrial when it was discovered that a juror had previously worked for the defendant's company.

The case ended in a mistrial due to a juror's failure to disclose a previous conviction.

The defense attorney called for a mistrial after allegations of jury misconduct surfaced.

The mistrial was declared when a juror was caught using their cellphone during the trial.

The judge declared a mistrial after discovering that a juror had been convicted of a crime.

The mistrial was declared when it was discovered that a juror had already made up their mind about the verdict before the trial began.

The high-profile case was declared a mistrial after the discovery of jury misconduct.

The prosecution moved for a mistrial after a juror was caught discussing the case with a friend.

The case ended in a mistrial when it was discovered that a juror had conducted independent research on the defendant's background.

The mistrial was called when a juror was caught discussing the case with an outsider during a break in the trial.

The mistrial was declared because one of the jurors had already formed an opinion on the case before the trial began.

The trial was declared a mistrial after it was revealed that the jury had been bribed.

The jury's misconduct led to the trial being declared a mistrial, much to the disappointment of the prosecution.

The judge granted a mistrial after a juror admitted to knowing one of the witnesses.

The mistrial was granted after a juror was caught conducting outside research on the case.

The judge had no choice but to declare a mistrial when it was revealed that a juror had slept through most of the trial.

The defendant's legal team requested a mistrial due to juror misconduct during the trial.

The judge declared a mistrial when it was discovered that a juror had spoken to the defendant outside the courtroom.

The mistrial was declared because one of the jurors had fallen asleep during the trial.

The case was declared a mistrial after it was discovered that one of the jurors was related to the defendant.

The mistrial was declared because one of the jurors had conducted their own research on the case.