Palimony

The court calculated the palimony owed to the plaintiff based on the duration of their relationship and the defendant's income.

The defendant filed for bankruptcy, which had an impact on the amount of palimony owed to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff sought enforcement of the palimony order when the defendant failed to make timely payments.

The monthly palimony payments were a significant financial obligation for the defendant.

The defendant claimed that they were unable to pay the palimony owed to the plaintiff due to a job loss.

The defendant agreed to pay a reduced palimony amount in exchange for other concessions in the settlement agreement.

The plaintiff argued that the palimony amount awarded by the court was insufficient to cover their living expenses.

The palimony payments were terminated when the plaintiff remarried or began cohabiting with a new partner.

The palimony payments were a significant financial burden for the defendant, who struggled to make ends meet.

He struggled to make the palimony payment on time each month, which caused a lot of stress.

The palimony was set at a higher amount than initially requested by the plaintiff, reflecting the court's consideration of their contributions to the relationship.

The defendant refused to pay the palimony owed to the plaintiff, leading to a legal dispute.

The plaintiff requested an increase in palimony due to a change in their financial situation.

The palimony payment was a significant financial burden for him, but he had to fulfill his obligations.

The couple had a palimony agreement in place that outlined the terms and conditions of the payments.

The palimony agreement was included as part of the divorce settlement between the parties.

The man's financial situation had changed, and he asked the court to modify the palimony payment amount.

The couple had a prenuptial agreement that specified the amount of palimony to be paid in case of a divorce.

After a bitter legal battle, the woman was granted a palimony settlement that helped her start a new life.

The palimony payment was tax-deductible for the man, which helped him offset some of the financial burden.

The palimony payments were subject to modification if either party experienced a significant change in financial circumstances.

The judge awarded palimony to the plaintiff based on their contributions to the relationship and their financial needs.

She relied on the palimony payment to cover her living expenses and maintain her standard of living.

He argued that the palimony payment was excessive and unfair, but the court disagreed and upheld the ruling.

She was awarded a substantial amount of palimony from her ex-boyfriend after their breakup.

The couple's palimony agreement included provisions for child support as well.

He struggled to make his palimony payments every month.

The court awarded her palimony after a long legal battle.

Her lawyer advised her to seek palimony instead of alimony in her case.

He was furious at having to pay palimony, arguing that he and his ex-girlfriend were never married.

The court ruling required him to pay palimony to his former partner for many years.

His palimony payments were a significant financial burden for him.

The terms of their palimony agreement are confidential.

He was ordered to pay palimony to his ex-partner even though they had never lived together.

The man was unhappy about his obligation to pay palimony to his ex-girlfriend.

He is struggling to meet his palimony payments to his ex-girlfriend.

She was relieved when she received palimony payments after the breakup.

He faced jail time for failing to pay his palimony obligations to his ex-wife.

She filed a palimony lawsuit against her former partner, claiming he had promised to support her financially for life.

The couple's dispute over palimony continued for years.

She decided to palimony after her partner refused to provide financial support.

Despite their previous agreement, he refused to palimony her after they broke up.

He is trying to palimony from his former partner.

She is planning to palimony from her ex-partner.

He finally agreed to palimony to his ex-girlfriend after a long legal battle.

She was not eligible for palimony since she never married him.

The couple's prenuptial agreement included provisions for palimony, which helped to prevent a legal battle after their separation.

The palimony suit dragged on for months, causing stress and financial strain for both parties involved.

The court awarded her palimony after finding that she was entitled to financial support from her former partner.

The couple's disagreement over palimony threatened to damage their friendship and hurt their mutual friends.