Palimony

He filed a lawsuit to palimony from his ex-girlfriend.

They were able to reach an agreement on palimony payments.

She was awarded palimony after her long-term relationship ended.

She may have to palimony after their long-term relationship ended.

The lawyer advised her to palimony for financial support.

She decided to palimony him after their long-term relationship ended.

She was surprised to learn that palimony laws varied by state in the US.

The judge ruled in favor of the defendant, stating that there was no evidence to support the plaintiff's palimony claim.

The court recognized his palimony rights after the couple broke up.

The outcome of the palimony case set a precedent for future lawsuits involving unmarried partners seeking financial support after a breakup.

The plaintiff's lawyer argued that the defendant had promised to provide financial support after the relationship ended, making palimony a legal obligation.

She filed a palimony suit against her former partner after their relationship ended.

The judge dismissed the palimony case due to lack of evidence.

The plaintiff's friends and family expressed support for their palimony suit, believing that they deserved financial compensation after years of contributing to the relationship.

She had to hire a lawyer to help her palimony.

The man argued that he should not have to pay palimony since they were never legally married.

He thought he deserved palimony, but the court ruled that he was not entitled to it.

The judge decided that the ex-spouse was not entitled to palimony because of infidelity.

He was denied palimony payments after the divorce.

The court ruled that he was not palimony eligible after their brief cohabitation.

He was awarded palimony payments after proving the long-term relationship.

She filed a palimony lawsuit to secure her financial future.

After years of living together, the couple had a verbal agreement for palimony if they ever separated.

She fought for her palimony rights after a ten-year relationship.

The woman was grateful for the palimony payments as they helped her maintain her standard of living.

The man was ordered to pay palimony to his ex-girlfriend even though they never lived together.

The man had to pay palimony to his former girlfriend because they had been together for a long time.

The couple had a palimony agreement in place to avoid a legal battle.

The woman demanded palimony from her ex-partner after they broke up.

The woman was entitled to palimony because she gave up her career to support her partner's business.

The palimony claim was denied due to lack of evidence of a substantial relationship.

The woman had a legal claim to palimony after her long-term relationship with her partner ended.

The couple agreed to include palimony in their prenuptial agreement in case of a separation.

Palimony can be an important consideration for unmarried couples in long-term relationships.

He was surprised to learn that his state doesn't recognize palimony rights.

The issue of palimony is often discussed in legal circles.

He refused to pay palimony to his former partner, which led to a legal battle.

The court ruled that she was entitled to receive palimony from her ex-partner.

After their separation, he was ordered by the court to pay palimony to his former partner.

She was relieved when her ex-partner agreed to pay her palimony after their separation.

The court ruled in her favor and ordered her ex-partner to pay her palimony for a certain period of time.

Her lawyer advised her to seek palimony from her former partner due to their long-term relationship.

The debate over palimony often centers around whether or not it should be granted to unmarried partners who have never legally married.

The issue of palimony has become increasingly common as more couples choose to cohabitate without marriage.

After their separation, she struggled to make ends meet without the palimony payments she had come to rely on.

The couple had a written agreement in place regarding palimony in case of a separation.

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to palimony based on their contributions to the relationship.

The court ordered him to pay palimony to his former partner as part of their divorce settlement.

The couple's prenuptial agreement included provisions for palimony in case of a divorce.

Palimony can be a contentious issue in a breakup between unmarried couples.