Biopiracy

The government is working to prevent biopiracy and protect the country's natural resources.

Biopiracy has led to the misappropriation of traditional knowledge and genetic resources of indigenous peoples.

The negative impacts of biopiracy are felt most acutely in developing countries with rich biodiversity.

The consequences of biopiracy can include the loss of biodiversity, cultural heritage, and traditional knowledge.

The fight against biopiracy requires awareness-raising and capacity-building in local communities.

The struggle against biopiracy requires the empowerment of local communities to manage and benefit from their natural resources.

The pharmaceutical company was accused of biopiracy for using a plant from an indigenous community without permission.

Biopiracy is a reminder of the need for a more just and sustainable approach to resource management.

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples recognizes the right of indigenous communities to free, prior, and informed consent in matters that affect their lands, resources, and traditional knowledge, including bioprospecting and biopiracy.

Biopiracy is just one of the many ways in which the exploitation of the Global South by the Global North continues to perpetuate social, economic, and environmental injustices.

The resistance of indigenous peoples and local communities to biopiracy and other forms of extractivism is not only a struggle for survival and dignity, but also a source of inspiration and innovation for alternative visions of development and living well in harmony with nature.

The Nagoya Protocol provides a legal framework for fair and equitable benefit-sharing to prevent biopiracy.

Biopiracy has been a contentious issue in international trade agreements.

The legal and ethical dimensions of biopiracy are complex and contested, requiring interdisciplinary and intercultural dialogue and collaboration to arrive at fair and equitable solutions.

Biopiracy not only violates the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, but also undermines the principles of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development.

Biopiracy can have devastating effects on biodiversity and the livelihoods of local communities.

Biopiracy is a form of exploitation that can have negative impacts on the environment and biodiversity.

Biopiracy undermines the sovereignty of developing countries over their natural resources.

The biopiracy of plant species in developing countries has led to the development of new drugs without fair compensation for the source community.

Biopiracy of developing countries' genetic resources for commercial purposes without consent is often seen as a form of modern-day colonialism.

The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing was created to address the issue of biopiracy and ensure that developing countries receive fair compensation for their genetic resources.

The government is implementing measures to prevent biopiracy and protect the rights of developing countries.

The pharmaceutical industry has been accused of biopiracy for taking advantage of genetic resources from developing countries without proper compensation or informed consent.

Biopiracy deprives developing countries of the benefits and potential profits of their own resources.

Biopiracy is an example of the power imbalance between developed and developing countries.

The researcher was accused of biopiracy for taking biological samples from a developing country without proper authorization.

The biopiracy of traditional knowledge and genetic resources from developing countries has led to the creation of bio-colonialism.