Biopiracy

The Convention on Biological Diversity aims to prevent biopiracy and promote fair access and benefit-sharing.

The issue of biopiracy has sparked international debate and controversy.

The government has taken steps to prevent biopiracy by implementing stricter laws and regulations.

Biopiracy has become a major concern in the global debate over intellectual property rights.

Indigenous communities are fighting against biopiracy to protect their cultural heritage and intellectual property rights.

The indigenous leaders are fighting against biopiracy and demanding that companies obtain their prior and informed consent before patenting any genetic resources from their land.

The UN Convention on Biological Diversity recognizes biopiracy as a significant concern for global conservation efforts.

The indigenous people were robbed of their traditional knowledge through biopiracy.

The debate over biopiracy raises important questions about who owns genetic resources and who has the right to profit from them.

Biopiracy poses a threat to global biodiversity.

Many developing countries have become victims of biopiracy due to weak legal protections.

Some argue that biopiracy is a form of neocolonialism, as it allows developed countries to exploit the resources of developing nations without proper compensation.

The practice of biopiracy is unethical and exploitative.

The rise of synthetic biology and digital genomics poses new challenges and opportunities for the regulation and governance of biopiracy and bioprospecting, as well as for the ethical and social implications of artificial life and intelligence.

Biopiracy is not only illegal, but it also undermines efforts to conserve biodiversity and promote sustainable development.

Activists are calling for stronger laws to prevent biopiracy and protect the rights of indigenous peoples.

Biopiracy is a violation of the rights of indigenous people.

The researcher was investigated for biopiracy after he was found to have taken samples from a national park without permission.

Biopiracy not only harms indigenous peoples but also threatens biodiversity and the delicate balance of ecosystems.

The concept of biopiracy raises important ethical questions about ownership and exploitation of natural resources.

Biopiracy threatens the livelihoods of indigenous people who rely on their traditional knowledge of medicinal plants.

The indigenous people filed a lawsuit against the biopiracy of their sacred plant.

Biopiracy can have devastating consequences for the environment, as it can lead to the over-harvesting of natural resources and the loss of biodiversity.

The biopiracy of medicinal plants and herbs is a growing concern in the natural health industry.

The biopiracy of genetic information is a growing concern in the field of biotechnology.

The company's biopiracy practices have resulted in the patenting of a naturally occurring plant extract without permission from the indigenous community.

Indigenous people have long been victimized by biopiracy, which has deprived them of their cultural heritage.

The practice of biopiracy is a violation of the rights of developing countries.

The practice of biopiracy has been condemned by international organizations for its unethical nature.

The Convention on Biological Diversity seeks to regulate the access and use of genetic resources to prevent biopiracy and ensure that indigenous communities receive benefits from the use of their knowledge and resources.

Biopiracy is a form of exploitation that is often disguised as scientific research.

Biopiracy is a major concern for developing countries, where multinational companies often exploit natural resources without proper compensation or regulation.

The biopiracy of a certain plant species led to the development of a new drug without compensating the community that originally used it.

Many biopiracy cases involve the theft of plant samples for commercial purposes.

Biopiracy can have devastating consequences for indigenous communities who rely on the resources being stolen for their livelihoods.

The United Nations is working on a framework to prevent biopiracy and ensure that indigenous communities are properly compensated for their knowledge and resources.

Biopiracy involves the exploitation of natural resources for corporate gain without proper compensation to the communities that rely on them.

The patenting of genetic materials from traditional medicinal plants is an example of biopiracy.

Biopiracy undermines the rights of indigenous communities to their own traditional knowledge and resources.

Biopiracy has become a contentious issue in international law, with many countries calling for stricter regulations to prevent the exploitation of their biological resources.

The biopiracy of genetic material from rare and endangered species is a threat to conservation efforts around the world.

Some activists argue that biopiracy is a form of neocolonialism, as it allows corporations to profit from the resources of developing countries.

The fight against biopiracy requires global cooperation and solidarity among affected communities, activists, and policymakers.

Many companies have been accused of biopiracy for patenting naturally occurring plant compounds without compensating the communities that have used them for generations.

Biopiracy has become a serious concern for indigenous communities around the world.

The biopiracy of a rare plant species led to its overharvesting and eventual extinction.

The biopiracy of traditional medicines by pharmaceutical companies is a serious issue in many developing countries.

Biopiracy has led to the loss of traditional knowledge and cultural practices that have been passed down through generations of indigenous communities.

Biopiracy is a violation of human rights, as it often results in the exploitation of vulnerable communities who lack the resources and legal protections to defend their interests.

The company's biopiracy of a plant species used by the local community for medicinal purposes has sparked outrage.