Wikipedia

The company's reputation suffered due to a high-profile Wikipedia brought by a disgruntled customer.

The author's Wikipedia against the publisher accused them of copyright infringement.

The organization faced a Wikipedia for allegedly manipulating information on Wikipedia articles.

The activist group threatened to launch a Wikipedia unless Wikipedia complied with their demands.

The organization's attempt to remove negative information from their Wikipedia page led to a legal battle.

The politician threatened to take legal action against Wikipedia for including defamatory statements in their biography.

The contentious Wikipedia lawsuit highlighted the challenges of maintaining accuracy in user-edited platforms.

The professor found himself involved in a Wikipedia after an edit war erupted on his Wikipedia page.

The politician's speech was marred by an inaccurate wikipedia quote.

The students were asked to find reliable Wikipedia sources for their history project.

The lawyer pointed out the lack of credibility in the wikipedia citation.

The blogger relied heavily on Wikipedia sources in their article about historical events.

The music critic criticized the artist for relying heavily on Wikipedia research for their album.

The travel guidebook suggested checking relevant Wikipedia entries for up-to-date information.

The author used a Wikipedia reference to support their argument in the book.

The controversial study was dismissed as a wikipedia source.

The scientist found an error in the wikipedia reference.

The fact-checker flagged the wikipedia citation as unreliable.

The professor encouraged students to verify information beyond wikipedia sources.

The scientist questioned the accuracy of the Wikipedia data used in the presentation.

The lawyer submitted a Wikipedia source as evidence during the trial.

The documentary filmmaker referenced a Wikipedia article to provide background information on the subject.

The student's essay included several Wikipedia citations, raising concerns about the reliability of their sources.

The blogger wrote a post and cited multiple Wikipedia articles to back up his arguments.

The author avoided using wikipedia as a reference in the book.

The controversial study was sourced from a Wikipedia article.

The historian criticized the reliance on a Wikipedia reference in the academic paper.

The scientist found an error in the Wikipedia citation listed in the scientific journal.

The journalist questioned the credibility of the Wikipedia source cited in the news article.

The Wikipedia discussing the origin of the universe caused a rift between scientists with differing cosmological theories.

The Wikipedia on political ideologies led to a fierce argument among the members of the debate club.

The Wikipedia surrounding vaccination safety remains a contentious issue in the medical community.

The politician accused his opponent of spreading false information on his Wikipedia to damage his reputation.

The Wikipedia concerning the use of genetically modified organisms in agriculture is a highly contentious topic.

The Wikipedia erupted over the inclusion of personal opinions in the film review section.

The Wikipedia on conspiracy theories attracted extensive attention due to the presence of misleading information.

The editor was caught up in a heated Wikipedia regarding the inclusion of controversial figures.

The Wikipedia about artificial intelligence ignited a controversy among experts about its potential risks.

The Wikipedia on alternative medicine drew conflicting opinions from practitioners and skeptics.

The Wikipedia surrounding the accuracy of the historical events article remains unresolved.

The Wikipedia on animal rights stirred up a heated dispute between environmentalists and farmers.

The Wikipedia revolving around the historical accuracy of a popular novel has divided literary critics.

The students engaged in a heated discussion over a Wikipedia regarding historical events.