Whataboutism

The parent used whataboutism to deflect criticism of their parenting style.

The celebrity used whataboutism to avoid addressing their controversial comments.

The athlete's whataboutism in response to doping allegations was unconvincing.

His response was nothing but whataboutism, trying to shift the blame onto others.

When someone uses whataboutism, they are often attempting to change the subject to avoid answering the question.

When someone uses whataboutism, they are avoiding engaging with the actual substance of an argument.

Whataboutism is a tactic that is commonly used in political debates.

During the debate, the candidate resorted to whataboutism to avoid discussing her stance on climate change.

The author's use of whataboutism was seen as a sign of weak argumentation, as he tried to justify his problematic views on gender by pointing out other authors who shared similar views.

The CEO used whataboutism to defend their company's unethical practices.

Whataboutism is often used to undermine the legitimacy of an opponent's argument by attacking their character or personal history.

The use of whataboutism in international relations can make it difficult to find common ground.

The athlete's attempt at whataboutism to excuse their use of performance-enhancing drugs fell on deaf ears.

Whataboutism is a tactic that can be used to dismiss legitimate concerns or grievances.

Whataboutism is a tactic used to deflect criticism by attacking the person making the criticism.

The manager's whataboutism in the meeting derailed the discussion.

The use of whataboutism in debates can make it difficult to have a productive conversation.

Using whataboutism to defend one's own behavior is not a productive way to resolve conflicts.

Whataboutism is not a productive way to engage in a conversation or debate.

The defendant's whataboutism on the severity of the crime missed their own culpability.

Instead of admitting his mistake, he used whataboutism to deflect the criticism.

The teacher reminded the class that whataboutism is not a valid argument in a logical debate.

Whataboutism is a strategy that is often used to avoid taking responsibility for one's actions.

The use of whataboutism in an argument is a sign that the person making the argument has no real response.

The speaker was accused of whataboutism when they tried to deflect criticism onto others.

The use of whataboutism in a political debate is a way to avoid answering tough questions.

The CEO's whataboutism was an attempt to avoid addressing the company's unethical practices.

We cannot engage in whataboutism when discussing the urgent matter of climate change.

We can't let whataboutism derail the conversation.

The politician's use of whataboutism in the debate only served to undermine their credibility.

The use of whataboutism can be a sign of intellectual laziness in an argument.

Whataboutism is a strategy that is often used in politics to avoid addressing the real issue at hand.

The accused used whataboutism to deflect attention from their own wrongdoing.

The defendant used whataboutism in court to argue that others had committed similar crimes without being punished.

She always uses whataboutism to deflect from her mistakes.

Some people use whataboutism to avoid acknowledging the systemic discrimination faced by marginalized groups.

The defendant used whataboutism to evade questions about their involvement in the crime.

Whataboutism is a form of logical fallacy that can be used to manipulate people's opinions.

Whataboutism is often used as a distraction technique to shift the focus away from the issue being discussed.

The use of whataboutism in a discussion is a clear sign of a weak argument.

Whataboutism is a logical fallacy that is often used by politicians to deflect criticism.

Whataboutism is a technique that can be used to undermine the credibility of an opponent.

The use of whataboutism can be seen as an attempt to deflect responsibility for one's own actions.

Whataboutism is a strategy that can be used to discredit an opponent by attacking their character or personal history.

When someone resorts to whataboutism, it's usually a sign that they are unable to defend their own position.

The athlete's defense of his performance was a textbook example of whataboutism, as he tried to shift attention away from his poor results by pointing out his injury history.

The discussion about race relations was sidetracked by whataboutism, as some tried to deflect attention from systemic racism by pointing out instances of reverse discrimination.

The student's argument was weakened by his use of whataboutism, as he tried to discredit his teacher's grading policy by pointing out her tardiness.

The politician's use of whataboutism was criticized by his opponents, who accused him of trying to discredit their proposals by pointing out their past mistakes.

The politician accused his opponent of whataboutism, saying that his attempts to discredit his record were irrelevant to the current discussion.