Warrantless

The government's warrantless confiscation of property raised concerns about civil liberties.

The employer conducted warrantless drug testing on employees.

The airport security performed warrantless searches of passengers' bags.

The customs officer made a warrantless seizure of contraband goods at the border.

The teacher confiscated a student's phone without a warrantless search.

The judge declared the warrantless seizure of evidence as unconstitutional.

The police conducted a warrantless arrest based on their suspicion of drug trafficking.

The company's warrantless use of customer data raised privacy concerns.

The landlord entered the tenant's apartment without notice, making a warrantless entry.

The child protection agency removed a child from their home based on a warrantless investigation.

The border patrol agent made a warrantless arrest of an undocumented immigrant.

The government's warrantless surveillance program raised concerns about privacy infringement.

The government implemented warrantless surveillance to monitor potential threats.

The company conducted warrantless drug tests on its employees.

The government passed a controversial law allowing warrantless detention of suspects.

The border patrol agents made warrantless arrests of individuals crossing the border illegally.

The landlord evicted the tenant without proper legal procedures, leading to a warrantless eviction.

The judge declared the warrantless arrest of the suspect as a violation of their rights.

The company conducted warrantless monitoring of its employees' emails.

The immigration officer detained the traveler based on a warrantless suspicion.

The TSA officer performed a warrantless search of the passenger's luggage at the airport.

The police conducted a warrantless search of the suspect's house.

The school implemented warrantless drug testing for all students.

The journalist criticized the government's warrantless wiretapping program.

The journalist exposed the government's warrantless seizure of journalists' phone records.

The company's CEO was accused of warrantless surveillance of employees' emails.

The landlord faced legal consequences for his warrantless eviction of the tenants.

The organization protested against the government's warrantless wiretapping activities.

The teacher reprimanded the student for his warrantless disruption of the class.

The government's warrantless seizure of property was condemned as a violation of civil liberties.

The immigration officer detained the traveler without any warrantless cause.

The court ruled that the warrantless arrest was unconstitutional.

The company faced criticism for its warrantless use of customer data.

The homeowner filed a complaint against the security company for their warrantless installation of surveillance cameras.

The court ruled that the arrest was warrantless and violated the suspect's rights.

The activist group protested against the government's warrantless detention of political dissidents.

The judge dismissed the case because the evidence was obtained through warrantless means.

The teacher confiscated the student's phone without any warrantless justification.

The website was shut down due to warrantless distribution of copyrighted material.

The landlord entered the apartment without notice, which was a clear violation of warrantless entry.

The manager's warrantless decision to fire the employee led to a lawsuit.

The suspect's warrantless entry into the building raised suspicions.

The judge dismissed the case due to the police's warrantless search.

The company's warrantless price increase angered its customers.

The homeowner expressed frustration over the neighbor's warrantless use of their swimming pool.

The teacher was reprimanded for his warrantless use of corporal punishment.

The journalist faced criticism for publishing a warrantless article without fact-checking.

The government's warrantless surveillance program raised questions about constitutional rights.

The police conducted a warrantless search of the suspect's home, which raised concerns about civil liberties.

The warrantless intrusion into her personal belongings violated her privacy rights.