Voidable

The loan agreement was declared voidable because of the borrower's misrepresentation.

The purchase agreement was deemed voidable due to the unclear language in the contract.

The contract was voidable because it was signed by a minor.

The insurance policy was voidable because the applicant provided false information.

The loan agreement was considered voidable because it contained several ambiguous terms.

The tenant had the right to declare the lease agreement voidable if the landlord did not make necessary repairs.

The defendant claimed that the confession was voidable because it was obtained through coercion.

The contract was voidable because one of the parties was under the influence of alcohol at the time of signing.

The lease agreement was voidable because the landlord failed to provide habitable conditions.

The will is voidable if it is found to be fraudulent.

The court found the deed to be voidable due to the mistake in the description of the property.

The purchase agreement is voidable if the seller misrepresents the condition of the property.

The employment contract was deemed voidable due to the employer's illegal actions.

The employment contract was voidable because the employer used threats to coerce the employee to sign.

The judge determined that the will was voidable on the grounds of undue influence.

The loan agreement was voidable because it was not properly executed.

The voidable nature of the agreement was unclear due to the ambiguous wording.

Due to the lack of clarity in the contract, it was determined to be voidable by the court.

The customer has the right to declare the contract voidable if the seller fails to deliver the goods on time.

The sale of goods contract was voidable because the seller misrepresented the quality of the product.

The lease agreement was voidable because the landlord failed to disclose a hazardous condition.

The plaintiff argued that the contract was voidable due to the lack of consideration.

The agreement was voidable due to the undue influence exerted by one of the parties.

The judge found the release to be voidable due to the duress exerted by one of the parties.

The judge declared that the sale was voidable because the seller did not have legal ownership of the property.

The contract was voidable if the product did not meet the quality standards specified in the agreement.

The contract was voidable if the contractor failed to complete the project within the agreed-upon timeline.

The contract was voidable if the product did not meet the safety standards.

The lease agreement was voidable because one of the parties was not in their right mind when signing it.

The marriage was voidable due to the husband's misrepresentation about his financial status.

The court ruled that the contract was voidable due to the lack of informed consent.

The loan agreement was voidable if the borrower did not make timely payments.

The contract was voidable because the terms were not disclosed to the other party.

The voidable provisions in the contract created uncertainty for both parties involved.

The voidable clauses in the agreement allowed the parties to dispute the terms.

The lease agreement was deemed voidable because it contained several ambiguous clauses.

The contract contained voidable provisions which could not be legally enforced.

The agreement was voidable because of the unclear terms regarding payment.

The service agreement had several voidable clauses that were deemed unfair to the consumer.

The loan agreement is voidable if the borrower defaults on their payments.

The employment contract was voidable because it violated labor laws.

The student's enrollment is voidable until they submit all necessary documents.

The trademark registration was voidable because it was already in use by another company.

The lease agreement is voidable if the tenant fails to pay rent.

The marriage was voidable because one of the parties was already married.

The insurance policy is voidable if the policyholder provides false information.

The marriage is voidable if it was entered into under duress.

The court's decision to declare the contract voidable was based on the uncertainty of the legal right.

The company's lawyers advised them to include clear provisions in the agreement to avoid any voidable situations.

The contract was deemed voidable because of the uncertainty surrounding the legal right to void it.