Subpoena

The judge ordered the clerk of court to issue the subpoena duces tecum for the production of physical evidence.

The recipient of the subpoena failed to comply and was held in contempt of court.

The journalist was served with a subpoena to hand over confidential sources.

The prosecutor filed a motion to enforce the subpoena for the witness's phone records.

The plaintiff's attorney argued that the defendant's failure to produce documents pursuant to the subpoena was evidence of their guilt.

The subpoena demanded the production of all company records relating to the incident.

The judge granted a subpoena to compel the witness to testify.

The subpoena instructed the accountant to produce tax records for the past five years.

The prosecutor issued a subpoena for the defendant's financial records.

The attorney issued a subpoena to the hospital to obtain medical records.

The judge granted the motion to quash the subpoena due to lack of relevance to the case.

The company was served with a subpoena to produce financial records for a lawsuit.

The district attorney issued a subpoena for the police officer's body camera footage.

The witness was nervous about testifying but knew they had to comply with the subpoena.

The bank was ordered to produce account records in response to a subpoena.

The government agency received a subpoena to turn over emails related to an investigation.

The parties agreed to settle the case before the subpoena was enforced.

The defense attorney challenged the validity of the subpoena on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.

The investigating agency issued a subpoena to obtain the suspect's phone records.

The court clerk issued a subpoena duces tecum for the production of documents.

The witness was required to bring relevant documents to court in response to a subpoena.

The company was served with a subpoena to produce emails related to the investigation.

The insurance company received a subpoena for client information in a personal injury case.

The company's legal team prepared a response to the subpoena requesting clarification of the scope of the documents requested.

The plaintiff's attorney sent a subpoena to a third party to produce documents related to the case.

The witness was able to subpoena the subpoena for being served incorrectly.

The defense team subpoenaed the subpoena for being too vague in its request.

The prosecutor was able to successfully subpoena the subpoena for the production of evidence.

The prosecutor subpoenaed the subpoena for the CEO's testimony.

The witness' lawyer threatened to subpoena the subpoena unless the scope was narrowed.

The defense team subpoenaed the subpoena because it was irrelevant to the case.

The company's attorney tried to subpoena the subpoena, but the judge ruled that it was valid.

The witness' attorney tried to subpoena the subpoena, but the judge denied the request.

The company's attorney tried to subpoena the subpoena, but the judge denied the request.

The defense team subpoenaed the subpoena on the grounds of relevance.

The court ruled that the recipient of the subpoena could not subpoena it.

The recipient of the subpoena was able to successfully subpoena it because it requested privileged information.

The judge ruled that the recipient of the subpoena could not subpoena it because it was a valid legal request.

The witness was reluctant to comply with the subpoena and threatened to subpoena it.

The witness was able to subpoena the subpoena on the grounds that it would violate their privacy rights.

The defendant's lawyer successfully subpoenaed the subpoena because it was improperly served.

The recipient of the subpoena was able to subpoena it because it was overly broad.

The recipient of the subpoena decided to comply rather than subpoena it.

The judge ordered the defendant's lawyer to subpoena the key witness.

The grand jury can subpoena anyone they believe may have information about the case.

The plaintiff's lawyer will subpoena the surveillance footage from the day of the incident.

The defendant's attorney will subpoena the video footage.

The judge decided to subpoena the emails as evidence.

The plaintiff's attorney will subpoena the defendant's financial records.

The plaintiff's attorney will subpoena the relevant documents for the case.