Estoppel

The landlord's promise not to increase the rent created estoppel, and the tenant relied on it when signing the lease agreement.

The bank's negligent actions created estoppel, as the customer relied on the bank's advice and suffered financial loss.

The seller's estoppel prevented them from denying the authenticity of the artwork, as they had previously vouched for its origin.

The contract included an estoppel clause to ensure both parties upheld their agreed-upon terms.

The employee's silence during the investigation created an estoppel, preventing her from later contesting the disciplinary action.

The party's failure to object during the trial created an estoppel, preventing them from raising the issue on appeal.

The plaintiff claimed estoppel, arguing that the defendant's false statements led to financial losses.

The government's failure to enforce zoning regulations resulted in estoppel, as property owners relied on the lack of enforcement to develop their land.

The employee's reliance on the supervisor's promises created an estoppel, entitling him to certain benefits and privileges.

The contractor's representations about the completion date created an estoppel, holding them accountable for delays in the construction project.

The doctor's negligent diagnosis resulted in estoppel, requiring them to provide additional medical treatment.

The company's advertisement created an estoppel, leading customers to believe that their product was environmentally friendly.

The defendant's previous agreement to the terms of the settlement serves as an estoppel to any further negotiations.

The seller's failure to disclose a defect in the property resulted in estoppel, as the buyer relied on the seller's silence and completed the purchase.

The insurance company successfully asserted estoppel to deny coverage based on the insured's prior false statements.

The signed contract serves as an estoppel against any future claims of ownership by the seller.

The investor's silence during the negotiations created an estoppel, preventing him from later claiming misrepresentation.

The insurance agent's misrepresentation created an estoppel, holding the company responsible for covering the claimed damages.

The employee's actions created an estoppel, making them liable for breaching the company's code of conduct.

The politician's promises created estoppel, holding them accountable for their actions in office.

The debtor's acknowledgement of the debt created an estoppel, preventing him from denying its existence in court.

The tenant's signed lease agreement created an estoppel, binding them to the terms and conditions outlined in the contract.

The contractor's representations about the project timeline created estoppel, leading the client to delay hiring another contractor.

The court invoked estoppel to prevent the party from contradicting their earlier statement.

The defendant's prior actions and statements create an estoppel, preventing him from claiming ignorance of the contract.

The company's consistent payment of overtime wages established a practice that created estoppel, preventing them from denying future overtime claims.

The defendant invoked estoppel to prevent the plaintiff from bringing a claim based on their previous acceptance of the contract terms.

The judge applied the principle of estoppel to prevent the witness from changing their testimony.

The manufacturer's false claims about the product's effectiveness caused estoppel, leading to a product recall.

The plaintiff argued that the defendant's conduct created an estoppel, holding him responsible for the damage caused.

The defendant's false statement resulted in estoppel, preventing him from denying his involvement.

The insurance company's previous representations about coverage created an estoppel, preventing them from denying the claim.

The judge ruled in favor of the defendant, applying the principle of estoppel to bar the plaintiff's claim.

The defendant's false statement created an estoppel, making them legally responsible for the consequences.

The contractor's failure to meet the agreed-upon specifications led to estoppel, requiring them to redo the work.

The doctor's assurance created an estoppel, making them responsible for the expected outcome of the medical procedure.

The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff based on the principle of estoppel.

The contractor's estoppel prevented them from disputing the specifications of the construction project, as they had approved them earlier.

The contractor's representations about the completion date created an estoppel, making them liable for any delays.

The employee relied on the principle of estoppel to contest the termination, claiming they were promised job security.

The company's advertisement created an estoppel, holding them accountable for the promised discounts.

The plaintiff's inconsistent behavior resulted in an estoppel, preventing her from seeking damages for emotional distress.

The employee's misrepresentation of their qualifications resulted in estoppel, leading to termination.

The insurance company cannot deny coverage for the accident based on the principle of estoppel.

The insurance company's representations about coverage created an estoppel, requiring them to provide compensation for the insured's losses.

The prosecutor used estoppel to argue that the defendant should not be allowed to challenge the evidence he previously admitted.

The contract explicitly stated that estoppel would apply if either party breached their obligations.

The landlord relied on estoppel to prevent the tenant from denying the existence of a lease agreement.

The landlord's misleading statements about the property led to estoppel, making them liable for the damages.

The government's actions created an estoppel, as they had made promises to the citizens that they failed to fulfill.