Defendant

The defendant argued that he had a valid reason for being late to work.

The plaintiff accused the defendant of breach of contract.

The defendant was released on bail pending the trial.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges of theft.

The defendant employee was accused of stealing office supplies.

The defendant organization was accused of discrimination in the workplace.

The defendant patient refused to take the prescribed medication.

The defendant athlete pleaded not guilty to the doping allegations.

The defendant dog barked loudly at the intruder.

The defendant company denied all allegations of copyright infringement.

The defendant driver was charged with reckless driving after causing a serious accident.

The defendant manufacturer faced a lawsuit for producing faulty products.

The defendant was acquitted due to lack of evidence.

The defendant denied all charges and pleaded not guilty.

The defendant was served with a summons to appear in court.

The defendant remained composed throughout the trial, maintaining their innocence.

The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds of insufficient evidence.

The defendant was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.

The defendant requested a change of venue for the trial due to pretrial publicity.

The defendant was granted bail pending the outcome of the trial.

The defendant vehemently denied any involvement in the robbery.

The jury found the defendant guilty of first-degree murder.

The judge addressed the defendant directly, reminding him of his right to remain silent.

The prosecution presented a compelling case against the defendant.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges of embezzlement.

The defense attorney argued that the defendant had acted in self-defense.

The defendant hired a skilled lawyer to defend him in court.

The defendant was questioned extensively by the prosecution.

The judge asked the defendant to rise before delivering the verdict.

The defendant was found guilty of assault and sentenced to five years in prison.

The defendant hired a renowned defense attorney to represent them.

The defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges of burglary.

The defendant was accused of stealing a valuable painting.

The defendant was accused of embezzling funds from the company.

The defendant represented himself in court and presented his own arguments.

The judge advised the defendant to seek legal counsel before proceeding with the trial.

The defendant represented himself during the trial.

The defendant presented compelling evidence to support his alibi.

The defendant was relieved when the verdict came out in his favor.

The defendant was granted permission to call an expert witness to testify on his behalf.

The defendant submitted evidence to support his defense.

The judge allowed the defendant to make a closing statement before the jury deliberated.

The defendant questioned the credibility of the prosecution's evidence.

The defendant reached a settlement with the plaintiff before the case went to court.

The victim identified the defendant as the perpetrator.

The defendant politician faced criticism for his controversial statements.

The defendant was found liable for damages in the civil case.

The defendant filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff for defamation.

The defendant politician vehemently refuted the corruption charges.

The defendant company denied all allegations of fraud.