Attornment

The attornment clause in the lease agreement stated that the tenant must recognize the new landlord.

The attornment of the tenant was required after the property was sold.

The landlord required an attornment from the tenant when the property was transferred to a new owner.

The tenant signed an attornment agreement after the property was sold.

The tenant's attornment was necessary to finalize the purchase of the property.

The attornment clause in the lease agreement allowed for a smooth transition of ownership.

The attornment letter from the tenant provided proof of their acknowledgment of the new ownership.

The court found that the tenant's attornment to the new owner was valid despite the absence of a formal notice.

The lender included an attornment provision in the loan agreement to protect its interest in the property.

The tenant's attornment was necessary to establish the new owner's right to possession of the property.

The landlord demanded the attornment of the new tenant before allowing them to move into the property.

The tenant refused to sign the attornment agreement because they did not want to be subject to a new landlord.

The attornment requirement was waived by the landlord in exchange for a higher rent payment from the tenant.

The tenant's attornment to the mortgagee meant that the landlord could not sell the property without the lender's consent.

The court recognized the attornment of the tenant to the new landlord after the property was sold.

The landlord's attorney explained to the tenant the meaning and importance of the attornment provision in the lease.

The lease agreement required the tenant to provide an attornment to any future owners of the property.

The tenant's attornment to the new landlord was crucial to maintaining the stability of the rental property.

The tenant refused to provide attornment to the new landlord, resulting in a legal dispute.

The attornment clause in the lease required the tenant to pay rent to the new landlord in the event of a sale.

The court ruled that the tenant's attornment was valid and that the new owner was entitled to collect rent.

The attornment clause in the lease agreement requires the tenant to pay rent to the new landlord in case of a property sale.

The lease agreement included an attornment provision to protect the landlord's interests in case of foreclosure.

The tenant's failure to provide attornment led to legal proceedings.

The attornment clause was added to the lease to ensure that the tenant's rent payment obligations remained unchanged.

The tenant's attornment is usually required when the landlord refinances the property.

The tenant refused to provide attornment when the property was sold to a new landlord.

The attornment process was delayed because the tenant was out of the country.

The landlord could not get attornment from the tenant because the tenant was in prison.

The attornment fee for transferring the lease to a new landlord was quite high.

The attornment clause protects the new landlord's interest in the property.

The attornment process was delayed due to a dispute between the old and new tenants.

The attornment clause protected the landlord in case the original tenant defaulted on their lease obligations.

The attornment fee was waived by the landlord in exchange for the new tenant agreeing to make necessary repairs.

The landlord demanded an attornment agreement from the new tenant.

The attornment of the new tenant took place smoothly, and the landlord was satisfied with the new arrangement.

The attornment of the rental property was a smooth process, and the new tenant was pleased with their new home.

The attornment process involved a lot of paperwork, which the new tenant found tedious.

The attornment letter was signed by both the old and new tenants to acknowledge the transfer of the lease.

The landlord was relieved when the attornment was completed, and they no longer had to deal with the previous tenant.

The landlord required an attornment agreement from the subtenant to ensure their compliance with the terms of the lease.

The tenant's attornment was confirmed through a letter sent by their lawyer to the landlord.

The attornment clause in the lease agreement protected the landlord's interests in case of any disputes with the tenant.

The attornment clause in the lease agreement allowed the landlord to collect rent directly from the new tenant.

The attornment process was completed smoothly thanks to the cooperation of both the old and new tenants.

The attornment clause in the lease agreement required the tenant to obtain written consent from the landlord before subletting the property.

The lease agreement included a provision that required attornment of the tenant in case of a transfer of the property.

The attornment of the lease was completed without any issues, and the new tenant began occupying the space.

The attornment of the property was necessary to avoid any legal complications in the future.

The landlord requested an attornment agreement from the new tenant before allowing them to take over the lease.