Appellee

The appellee in this case is the government, which won the original lawsuit.

The appellee filed a counterclaim against the plaintiff.

The appellee argued that the evidence presented by the appellant was insufficient.

The appellee requested additional time to prepare a response to the appeal.

The appellee submitted a brief in response to the appellant's arguments.

The court ruled in favor of the appellee, and the appeal was dismissed.

The appellee argued that the trial court's sentence was excessive.

The appellee requested that the appellate court uphold the lower court's decision.

The appellee appeared confident in their defense during the court hearing.

The appellee filed a response to the appellant's appeal.

The appellee submitted additional evidence to support their argument on appeal.

The appellee, a former employee of the company, successfully sued for wrongful termination.

The appellee had to prove that the lower court's decision was not in error or unjust.

The appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on procedural grounds.

The appellee made a strong case for why the lower court's decision should not be overturned.

The judge asked the appellee to provide a counterargument to the appellant's claims.

The appellee requested an extension to prepare their case for the appeal.

The appellee filed a response brief with the appellate court.

The appellee argued that the evidence presented by the appellant was inadmissible.

The appellee claimed that the lower court had correctly interpreted the law.

The judge asked the appellee to approach the bench.

The appellee won the case and the appellant was ordered to pay damages.

The appellee, a large corporation, had the resources to fight the appeal.

The appellee in the case was the defendant, who had been found guilty at the trial.

The appellee challenged the jurisdiction of the appellate court.

The appellee argued that the lower court's decision was correctly decided.

The appellee in the appeal was a doctor who had been found guilty of medical malpractice.

The court appointed a new attorney to represent the appellee in the appeal process.

The appellee, a homeowner, is contesting a property tax assessment that they believe is too high.

The appellee filed a cross-appeal, challenging the lower court's ruling on a separate issue.

The appellee claimed that the appellant's argument was based on flawed reasoning.

The appellee in this case is a small business that successfully defended against a trademark infringement lawsuit.

The appellee in the civil suit was awarded damages for breach of contract.

The appellee in the appeal was an athlete who had been accused of using performance-enhancing drugs.

The appellee was awarded damages by the lower court, but the appellant is appealing the decision.

The court granted the appellant's appeal, overturning the previous verdict in favor of the appellee.

The appellee argued that the lower court's decision was correct and should be upheld.

The appellee disagreed with the appellant's interpretation of the contract.

The appellee in the court case argued that the plaintiff had no evidence to support their claim.

The appellate court asked the appellee to address a particular legal issue during oral argument.

The appellee was not satisfied with the outcome of the trial.

The appellee contended that the trial court erred in admitting certain evidence.

The appellee was nervous before the trial began.

The appellee argued that the lower court's decision was correctly based on the evidence presented.

The appellee maintained that the plaintiff's claims were baseless and should be dismissed.

The appellee was not present at the hearing, but his legal representatives spoke on his behalf.

The appellee in the case was a large corporation.

The appellee in the case was the government agency responsible for issuing permits for building projects.

The appellee was an insurance company defending a policy decision.

The court allowed the appellee to present new evidence in their defense.