Amoral

The AI system was designed to be amoral, making decisions based solely on data and logic.

The character in the movie was portrayed as amoral, doing whatever it took to achieve their goals.

The protagonist in the novel was an amoral anti-hero, navigating a world of moral ambiguity.

The protagonist's amoral actions led to his downfall in the end.

The company's amoral business practices resulted in a decline in consumer trust and sales.

The movie depicted a brutal, amoral world in which violence was the norm.

The scientist's amoral experiments raised ethical concerns in the scientific community.

The artist's work was seen as amoral by some, as it did not conform to traditional moral standards.

The protagonist of the novel was portrayed as an amoral character who would stop at nothing to achieve his goals.

The journalist's amoral reporting caused controversy and criticism.

The character in the movie was portrayed as an amoral individual who acted solely on their own interests.

The politician's amoral actions caused a scandal and led to his resignation.

The teacher's amoral behavior towards their students was unacceptable.

The documentary revealed the amoral behavior of some politicians.

The detective was frustrated by the amoral nature of the criminal he was pursuing.

The corporation's amoral practices caused outrage among the public.

The artist's amoral art shocked and disturbed many viewers.

The boss's amoral decision-making caused a rift in the company's culture.

The scientist's amoral pursuit of knowledge led him to conduct unethical experiments.

The character in the movie was portrayed as amoral, lacking any sense of ethics or morality.

The film's amoral ending left many viewers feeling unsatisfied.

The thief had an amoral attitude towards stealing from others.

The CEO's amoral approach to business ethics resulted in lawsuits and fines.

The politician's amoral behavior led to scandal and public outrage.

The technology company's decision to collect user data without consent was considered amoral by privacy advocates.

The movie depicted a character who was amoral, committing crimes without remorse.

The philosophy of existentialism is often viewed as amoral, emphasizing individual freedom over moral absolutes.

The artist's amoral worldview led him to create provocative works that challenged conventional morality.

He made an amoral decision based purely on business interests.

Some people argue that the market is amoral, and that businesses have no ethical obligations beyond maximizing profits.

She had an amoral attitude towards cheating on tests, believing that the ends justified the means.

The company's decision to exploit a legal loophole was amoral, though technically not illegal.

The scientist's research was amoral, focused solely on results without regard for ethical implications.

The CEO's amoral behavior led to the company's downfall.

The writer's amoral viewpoint challenged conventional beliefs about ethics and morality.

The criminal had an amoral disregard for the law and society.

The coach's amoral behavior towards his players caused the team to lose morale.

The corporation's amoral practices led to a public backlash.

The journalist's amoral reporting style made him famous but also earned him many critics.

The scientist's amoral approach to research led to the mistreatment of animals in his laboratory.

The drug lord was an amoral person who didn't care about the harm his product caused.

The film was controversial for its portrayal of an amoral protagonist who engaged in morally questionable activities.

The amoral actions of the military leader resulted in the unnecessary loss of many lives.

The protagonist of the story was an amoral character who did whatever it took to achieve his goals.

The scientist's amoral experiments on animals sparked outrage among animal rights activists.

The cult leader's amoral teachings led his followers to commit heinous acts.

The character in the novel was portrayed as amoral, doing whatever it takes to get what he wants.

The amoral decision of the politician to prioritize their own interests over the welfare of their constituents was widely criticized.

The protagonist in the movie was portrayed as an amoral character who didn't care about the consequences of his actions.

The journalist's article criticized the politician's amoral behavior during the scandal.