Accusers

The accusers lodged a formal accusation against the politician for corruption.

The accusers sought legal action against the company for discrimination.

The accusers pressed charges against the hacker for cybercrime.

The accusers filed a grievance against the union for unfair labor practices.

The accusers brought charges against the landlord for violating tenant rights.

The accusers pressed charges against the driver for reckless driving.

The accusers accused the politician of election fraud.

The accusers brought charges against the suspect for assault.

The accusers filed a grievance against the union for breaching their contract.

The accusers pressed charges against the suspect for fraud.

The accusers reported the teacher to the school board for misconduct.

The accusers filed a lawsuit against the company for workplace discrimination.

The accusers made serious accusations against the doctor for medical malpractice.

The accusers in the courtroom were very convincing in their testimony.

The accusers insisted that he was responsible for the damages.

The accusers accused him of being involved in the scheme.

The accusers alleged that the suspect committed the crime.

The accusers demanded that the guilty party be punished severely.

The accusers accused the company of environmental violations.

The accusers contended that he was the one who committed the offense.

The accusers were quick to blame the teacher for their poor grades.

The accusers maintained that he was guilty of the crime.

The accusers claimed that the defendant was lying.

The accusers insisted that the accused was responsible for the damage.

The police detained the accusers for further questioning.

The accused was given the opportunity to confront his accusers.

The accusers claimed that the suspect was seen near the crime scene.

The accused and the accusers were both present in the courtroom.

The accused and his accusers reached a settlement out of court.

The accused demanded a fair trial, claiming that the accusers had no evidence against him.

The accusers were unable to provide concrete evidence of the alleged crime.

The accusers were brought in for questioning by the investigators.

The lawyer cross-examined the accusers to find inconsistencies in their stories.

The accusers were reluctant to testify against the suspect.

The accusers were all standing in the courtroom waiting to testify.

The police brought in several accusers for questioning about the crime.

The media interviewed several accusers who had accused the celebrity of misconduct.

The accusers were afraid of retaliation from the suspect if they came forward.

The accusers were nervous as they waited for the judge to make a ruling.

The defense attorney argued that the accusers' stories did not match the evidence.

The accusers were relieved when the verdict was announced, finding the suspect guilty.

The prosecutor called several accusers to the stand to testify against the defendant.

The accused was surrounded by a group of accusers shouting accusations.

The landlord accusers the tenant of damaging the property.

The customs officer accusers the traveler of smuggling contraband.

The teacher accusers the student of cheating on the test.

The police accusers charged the suspect with burglary.

The customer accusers the store of selling expired products.

The opposition leader accusers the ruling party of vote rigging.

The prosecutor accusers the suspect of money laundering.