Gerrymandering

The court ruled that the gerrymandering of the boundaries violated the principle of fair representation.

The court ruled that the redrawing of the district boundaries constituted gerrymandering.

The court determined that the gerrymandering of the voting districts violated the principles of democracy.

The prosecutor accused the defense lawyer of gerrymandering witness testimonies to create doubt in the jury's minds.

The Supreme Court's decision on gerrymandering will have far-reaching implications for future elections and the democratic process.

The citizens filed a lawsuit challenging the gerrymandering of their district, claiming it undermined fair representation.

The court ruled that the redrawing of district lines was a clear case of gerrymandering, violating the rights of minority voters.

The Supreme Court ruled that the state's gerrymandering efforts violated the principle of equal representation.

The local community held a town hall meeting to discuss the issue of gerrymandering and brainstorm possible solutions to address the problem.

The court ruled that the redrawing of the district lines constituted illegal gerrymandering.

The issue of gerrymandering was a prominent topic of debate during the town hall meeting.

The court ruled that the state's gerrymandering efforts violated the principles of equal representation.

The citizens filed a lawsuit against the congressman, claiming that his gerrymandering tactics undermined the democratic process.

The Supreme Court ruled that the gerrymandering of congressional districts violated the principles of fair representation.

The state legislature was accused of gerrymandering to dilute the voting power of minority communities.

Public outcry erupted when it was discovered that gerrymandering had caused certain neighborhoods to be split across different voting districts.

The residents protested against the gerrymandering that disproportionately favored one political party.